How does Miller initially present Rodolpho? Essay

moth miller initially depicts Rodolpho through the make wasting disease of of description, dialogue, stage boots, structure and punctuation. Miller uses these techniques to present Rodolpho as a transgressive, unsicilian wo military manish character.Miller initially presents Rodolpho as a transgressive character through the use of dialogue. Miller attempts to draw the audiences attention towards Rodolphos appearance when the character Catherine states How come hes so dark and youre so light. Miller business lines Rodolphos appearance with a traditional Sicilian man, Marco, suggesting that Rodolpho is an outsider in Sicilian culture. Millers nonion is emphasised when Catherine, again, childishly states Hes practically blond, the repetitive physical description suggests Millers disposition for to audience to be drawn to Rodolphos Unsicilian characteristic, furthered even more by Catherines dramatic answer to Rodolphos appearance, possibly indicating Rodolpho is the first blon de man she has seen, despite living in the overpopulated town of carmine Hooke.Miller presents Rodolpho through the use of stage directions. Miller possibly compares Rodolphos womanish characteristic to Catherines when He Rodolpho helps B set out the coffee, compared to Catherine continues ladling out the plates. In a patriarchal society, this behaviour was frowned upon, some(prenominal) to Eddies dismay. Miller could be using this comparison as prolepsis to when Eddie shouts Hes not slump later on in the play, with the quote symbolising Rodolphos feminine character. Another stage direction associated with Rodolpho (Smiling) suggests Miller is content with presenting Rodolpho as a feminine character, as Miller appears to present emotion with connotations of feminine behaviour, much like Rodolpho is consistently presented. Miller here utilises the technique of dramatic irony, the audience understands that Rodolphos feminine behaviour is frowned upon by Eddie, whilst Rodolpho hims elf is unaware, because of this tension builds up and one can argue that Rodolphos role in this play is to build tension.Whilst Rodolphos appearance differs from a traditional Sicilian man, Miller presents the initial mold that Rodolphos behaviour is adverse through the use of structure and stage directions. Rodolphos utterance aloofness is consistently longer than Marcos, and even the patriarch Eddie. In contrast, Marco, an example of a true Sicilian man speaks short Mono-syllabic sentences. Not only does the logorrheic Rodolpho have a long utterance length, Miller often punctuates Rodolphos sentences with exclamation marks .This subtle use of punctuation highlights Rodolphos emotion and passion, arguably a stereotypical Italian quality but when contrasted to the emotionless suspicious, quite-voiced Marco, an example of transgressive behaviour. Miller confirms Rodolphos behaviour is indecorous in Sicilian culture when Eddies is coming to address Marco more and more, the patriarc h of the house does not approve of Rodolphos behaviour but in comparison accepts the directly contrasting character, Marco.To conclude, Rodolpho is initially presented as a transgressive character through the use of dialogue, description, structure, punctuation and finally stage directions. Miller possibly choses to contrast Rodolpho with Marco to highlight the differences between American and Sicilian culture, Rodolphos behaviours perchance perceived as wrong in Sicilian culture but acceptable in an American society. On the other hand, Miller maybe equally trying to educate the, mainly American, audience about Sicilian culture.I think that the use of description was especially telling at indicating to the audience that Rodolpho was the outsider and possibly the centre of any drama. I do not think that Millers use of punctuation and stage directions are effective for a modern day audience because in an Americanised society, Rodolphos behaviour is acceptable whereas when the play w as shown to its captain audience, Millers use of stage directions would have been more effective. Overall, though, I think Miller has presented Miller initially as a transgressive character, and has done so very effectively.